Australien, pro Einwohner größter Verursacher von Treibhausgasen, hat gegen heftigen Widerstand der konservativen Opposition eine Steuer auf diese Abgase beschlossen

8 November 2011 Last updated at 09:58 GMT

Australia Senate backs carbon tax

Vapour rise from a steel mill chimney in the industrial town of Port Kembla, about 80 km (50 miles) south of Sydney, in this file photo taken July 7 Australia is the developed world’s worst polluter per head of population

Australia’s Senate has approved a controversial law on pollution, after years of bitter political wrangling.

The Clean Energy Act will force the country’s 500 worst-polluting companies to pay a tax on their carbon emissions from 1 July next year.

The Senate vote is a victory for Prime Minister Julia Gillard, who had given strong backing to the plan.

Environmentalists have broadly backed the scheme, but there have been large public protests against it.

Opposition parties have argued that the tax would cause job losses and raise the cost of living, and they have promised to repeal the legislation if they win the next election, due in 2013.

‚Victory for optimists‘

Continue reading the main story


  • To start on 1 July 2012
  • 500 companies affected
  • Agriculture, forestry and land are exempt
  • Compensation for polluters
  • Market-based trading scheme kicks in from 2015
  • Target to cut 159m tonnes of CO2 by 2020

The bill passed a vote in the lower house last month by just 74 votes to 72.

The Senate vote was also tight – 36 votes in favour, 32 against – with the government relying on the support of the Greens to get the bill passed.

Ms Gillard told a news conference it was „a win for those who would seek their fortunes and make their way by having jobs in our clean energy sector“.

„Today we have made history. After all those years of debate and division, our nation has got the job done,“ she said.

Continue reading the main story


image of Richard Black Richard Black Environment correspondent, BBC News

The vote in theory brings to an end a long-running and, in a global sense, highly symbolic issue.

Symbolic because Australia is one of the world’s highest per-capita emitters and has an economy that is more reliant than most on energy-intensive industries such as mining, including coal.

Yet of all developed countries, Australia is set to feel impacts of climate change earlier than most, and arguably is seeing them already in the recent severe droughts.

It also has immense potential for renewable electricity, particularly in the area of solar; and some are hoping the carbon tax and subsequent trading mechanism will kick-start a renewables revolution.

Whether the carbon tax is high enough to do that, though, is unclear. And investors may be restrained by the opposition’s vow to repeal the law if it gains office in 2013.

Emissions trading is scheduled for introduction in 2015. The European experience is that without tight caps on emissions, the carbon price remains far too low to stimulate change on the scale scientists calculate is necessary.

The government has set the initial price per tonne of carbon at A$23 ($23.80; £14.80), much higher than other similar schemes such as in the EU where the price is between $8.70 and $12.60 a tonne.

The country’s mining firms, airlines, steel makers and energy firms are among those expected to be hardest hit by the tax.

Domestic fuel bills are expected to rise as companies pass on the costs to consumers.

But the government hopes that the legislation will force innovation in renewable energy supplies, and free Australia from its reliance on fossil fuels.

The country accounts for 1.5% of the world’s emissions, but it is the developed world’s highest emitter per head of population thanks to its relatively small population.

The country’s politicians have been debating pollution-limiting legislation for years.

Former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd swept to power in 2007 after making the carbon tax central to his election campaign.

But his plans were bogged down in political infighting and public support evaporated.

Analysts have blamed his inability to get the law passed for his eventual ousting by Ms Gillard.


Kommentar verfassen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Abmelden /  Ändern )

Google+ Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google+-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Verbinde mit %s

%d Bloggern gefällt das: